Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.76 seconds)

Achin Gupta vs The State Of Haryana on 18 August, 2022

18.The learned trial judge also has correctly considered the welfare of the child and declined to grant divorce by observing that the dispute between the appellant and the respondent are not very serious and grave 17/21 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A(MD).No.291 of 2024 one. The same was petty quarrel. Due to marriage, God has blessed them with a beautiful child. Therefore, in the interest of institution of marriage, the learned trial Judge was declined to grant divorce. The said discussion of the learned trial Judge was in accordance with law and the same is fortified by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Achin Gupta Vs. State of Haryana and another reported in 2024 SCC Online SC 759 has held as follows:
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - A Bose - Full Document

Savitri Pandey vs Prem Chandra Pandey on 8 January, 2002

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis C.M.A(MD).No.291 of 2024 9.3.The Hon'ble Supreme Court similarly in the case of Savitri Pandey Vs. Prem Chandra Pandey, reported in AIR 2002 SC 591, has observed that desertion for the purpose of seeking divorce under the “Act” means the intentional permanent forsaking and abandonment of one spouse by the other without that other's consent and without reasonable cause. To constitute desertion total repudiation and withdrawal from the matrimonial obligation would have to be established.
Supreme Court of India Cites 14 - Cited by 291 - R P Sethi - Full Document
1