Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.20 seconds)

Era Sezhiyan vs T.R. Balu And Ors on 1 March, 1990

(10) Counsel for the petitioner has made reference to Era Sezliyan Vs T.R.Balu and others, . We have perused this judgment and Find that nothing said in this judgment supports the proposition being canvassed before us by the learned counsel for the petitioner that respondent is legally bound to bold elections of these three seats simultaneously. This judgment only quotes various rules and has only held that the election has tobe held in accordance with the rules. There is no dispute about this proposition of law.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 29 - M H Kania - Full Document
1