Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 23 (0.22 seconds)Section 363 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 3 in The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 [Entire Act]
Section 164 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 35 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 35 in The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 [Entire Act]
Shri Raja Durga Singh Of Solan vs Tholu on 1 May, 1962
23. There may be conflicting entries in the official
document and in such a situation, the entry made at a
later stage has to be accepted and relied upon. (Vide
Durga Singh v. Tholu.)
Birad Mal Singhvi vs Anand Purohit on 2 August, 1988
24. While dealing with a similar issue in Birad Mal
Singhvi v. Anand Purohit, this Court held as under: (SCC
p. 619, para 15)
"15. ... To render a document admissible
under Section 35, three conditions must be
satisfied, firstly, entry that is relied on must be one
in a public or other official book, register or
record; secondly, it must be an entry stating a fact
in issue or relevant fact; and thirdly, it must be
made by a public servant in discharge of his
official duty, or any other person in performance
of a duty specially enjoined by law. An entry
relating to date of birth made in the school
register is relevant and admissible under Section
35 of the Act, but entry regarding to the age of a
person in a school register is of not much
evidentiary value to prove the age of the person in
the absence of the material on which the age was
recorded."