Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 43 (0.59 seconds)The Hindu Succession Act, 1956
The Limitation Act, 1963
The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882
Section 122 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Vanita P. Sharma vs Parikshit Ramesh Sharma on 23 February, 2006
In the light of the judgement passed by the Hon'ble
the Supreme court of India in Veenita Sharma vs. Rakesh
Sharma reported in (2020) 9 SCC1 the daughter are
entitled for their shares in the ancestral properties."
Section 6 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Article 91 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Prem Singh & Ors vs Birbal & Ors on 2 May, 2006
44. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the gift deeds
as well as the relinquishment deed were void-ab-initio / null and void
and did not pass any right, title and interest to the defendant nos. 1 to 4
and accordingly the challenge to the gift deeds as well as the
relinquishment deed as void ab initio was only consequential to the
main relief of partition and the suit cannot be said to be barred by
limitation when seen in the light of the judgement passed in the case
of Prem Singh (supra) and the judgment passed in the case of Shanti
Devi (supra) and the judgement passed in the case of Sukhbiri Devi
(supra) does not help the appellants (defendant no. 1 to 4 ) in any
manner.