Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.23 seconds)The Apprentices Act, 1961
Employees' State Insurance ... vs Tata Engineering & Co. Locomotive ... on 8 October, 1975
Further it
is significant to note that the apprentices selected does
not exceed 50 at a time and according to the Standing
Orders of the petitioner, the petitioner is eligible to give
training to these apprentices. Therefore, it is contended
by the petitioner that the respondent has erred in holding
that these apprentices are employees of the petitioner-
company. There is every force in the said contention of
the petitioner herein. Further more, in support of their
above contention the petitioner-company relies on the
decision reported in Employees' State Insurance
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
12/19
C.M.A(MD)No.861 of 2022
Corporation V. Tata Engineering and Locomotive
Company, Ltd., and another [1975 (2) L.L.N. 498],
wherein the Supreme Court has held as follows, in Para
8, at page 501 :
Section 2 in The Explosive Substances Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Section 45A in The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Section 77 in The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
The Amending Act, 1897
Gnanambikai Mills Ltd. vs Employees' State Insurance ... on 7 July, 1969
15.The above said Judgment was followed in the case of Gnanambigai
Mills, Ltd., Coimbatore Vs. Employees' State Insurance Corporation
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
10/19
C.M.A(MD)No.861 of 2022
reported in 1998 (3) L.L.N. 402, the relevant paragraph No.7 is extracted
below: