Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.57 seconds)
Rajesh Tiwari vs Union Of India & Ors. on 10 September, 2013 cites

Union Of India & Ors vs Md.Islam & Anr on 23 July, 2010

"1. Overruling the decision reported as 2001 (1) SCC 720 Union of India v. Mohd. Aslam, in the decision dated April 28, 2009 in C.A. No. 3495/2005 R.R. Pillai (dead) (Through LRs) v. Commanding Officer HQ SAC & Ors., the Supreme Court held that W.P.(C) No.2768/2011 Page 1 of 4 employees of Unit Run Canteens in the Armed Forces are not government employees and thus cannot claim such benefits as could be asked by Government employees. The Supreme Court held that only those persons whose salaries are paid from the Consolidated Fund of India could claim the status of Central Government employees. But the question whether Unit Run Canteens are instrumentalities of the State and in that context what was the status of the employees of the Unit Run Canteen, was left open.
Patna High Court - Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 8 - S K Singh - Full Document

R.R. Pillai(Dead) Through L.Rs vs Commanding Officer Hq S.A.C.(U)& Ors on 28 April, 2009

"1. Overruling the decision reported as 2001 (1) SCC 720 Union of India v. Mohd. Aslam, in the decision dated April 28, 2009 in C.A. No. 3495/2005 R.R. Pillai (dead) (Through LRs) v. Commanding Officer HQ SAC & Ors., the Supreme Court held that W.P.(C) No.2768/2011 Page 1 of 4 employees of Unit Run Canteens in the Armed Forces are not government employees and thus cannot claim such benefits as could be asked by Government employees. The Supreme Court held that only those persons whose salaries are paid from the Consolidated Fund of India could claim the status of Central Government employees. But the question whether Unit Run Canteens are instrumentalities of the State and in that context what was the status of the employees of the Unit Run Canteen, was left open.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 14 - A Pasayat - Full Document

Layak Ram vs Quarter Master General & Ors. on 30 July, 1999

2. A learned Single Judge of this Court A.K. Sikri (as he then was) has in the case of Layak Ram Vs. Quarter Master General & Ors. 1999 (81) DLT 395 also similarly held that employees of canteens in Army Headquarter cannot file a writ petition as such employees are not employees of a State or an instrumentalities of the State within the meaning of Article 12 of the Constitution.
Delhi High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 5 - A K Sikri - Full Document
1