Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 23 (1.26 seconds)Section 301 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Babu vs State Of Kerala on 11 August, 2010
19. Similar observations were made in the case
of Babu v. State of Kerala 84 Cr.P.C Criminal Law
Journal 99 (Kerala High Court). The concern which
has been voiced by the Ld. Counsel for permitting the
private party to address the court, is that they may
seek private vengeance and try to obtain conviction
by hook or crook.
A. R. Antulay vs Ramdas Sriniwas Nayak And Another on 16 February, 1984
In the case of "A.R. Antulay v. Ramdas
Sriniwas 84(1) Crimes 457" it was observed that
CR No.13/12 S.P. Gupta
11
the principle that anyone can set or put the criminal
put the criminal law in motion remains intact unless
contra indicated by a statutory provision. The scheme
under the Code of Criminal Procedure clearly reveals
that anyone who wants to give information of an
offence may either approach the Magistrate or the
officer. In this context, it was thus concluded that the
concept of locus standi of a complainant is a concept
foreign to criminal jurisprudence.
Shri Bhagwan Lal Arya vs Commissioner Of Police Delhi & Ors on 16 March, 2004
28. The facts of present case are akin to the
situation visualized in the case of Bhagwan Singh
( Supra).