Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 19 (0.30 seconds)Section 11 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
The Limitation Act, 1963
Section 7 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 31 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 9 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002
Section 3 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Bharat Broadband Network Limited vs United Telecoms Limited on 16 April, 2019
“6. Learned counsel are also ad idem that, in view of
Section 12(5) of the 1996 Act read with the Seventh
Schedule thereto, the arbitral mechanism, contemplated
by the afore-extracted Clauses from the Purchase Order
2
CA No.3470/2022 (@ SLP (C) No. 8302/2021)
and the Agreement, cannot be allowed to operate, as
the Chairperson of the NDMC would be disabled from
appointing the arbitrator. This position stands
crystallized in a number decisions, including the
judgments of the Supreme Court in Bharat Broadband
Network Ltd. v. United Telecoms Ltd. (2019) 5 SCC 755
and Perkins Eastman Architects DPC v. IISCC (India)
Limited AIR 2020 SC 59, and of this Court in Proddatur
Cable TV DIGI Services v. SITI Cable Network Limited
MANU/DE/0178/2020.
New India Assurance Company Ltd vs Nusli Neville Wadia And Another on 13 December, 2007
In this regard, we may notice the following view
expressed by Justice S. B. Sinha in New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
v. Nusli Neville Wadia and another3: