Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.21 seconds)Section 5 in The Essential Commodities Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Essential Commodities Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
The State Of Uttar Pradesh And Ors. vs Suraj Bhan Pande on 3 April, 1972
A special appeal against the aforesaid decision of the learned single Judge was filed in Allahabad High Court which has been reported in State of Uttar Pradesh v Suraj Bhan Pande's case (AIR 1972 All 401) (supra). The judgment of learned single Judge was upheld by the Division Bench and it was observed:
Narain Dass Daulat Ram vs State Of Haryana And Anr. on 7 June, 1978
In M/s. Narain Dass Daulat Ram v. State of Haryana, AIR 1978 Punj & Har 310 also it was held that the Notification dated March 13, 1973, authorises the State Government to issue orders under Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Act in relation to Clause (g) of Section 2 thereof. It was also held that it was clear that the Government of Haryana had exercised this power while issuing the Notification dated May 24, 1978. In the first place, the mere omission to mention the Notification dated March 13, 1973, in the impugned Notification is immaterial and will not render it ultra vires and secondly, the specific mention in the impugned Notification that it was being issued in exercise of all powers enabling the Government of Haryana in this behalf to do so will effectively negative the objection.
Prag Ice And Oil Mills And Anr. Etc. Etc. vs Union Of India (Uoi) [Alongwith Writ ... on 21 February, 1978
33. It was then contended by Mr. Surana that the impugned Export Control Order is violative of Articles 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India. In this regard it was submitted that the impugned order fails to achieve its object of maintaining and increasing the supply of milk in Rajasthan because while it purports to put a ban on the export of milk outside the State of Rajasthan, it virtually achieves just the reverse of the same by enacting Clause 3 and at the same time permitting the Rajasthan Cooperative Dairy Federation Limited to export milk without any limit and without any consideration of the needs of the residents of Rajasthan to any place outside Rajasthan. It is further contended that the order also fails to achieve its object because it bans the export of milk but permits the export of Mawa, Paneer, etc. and also permits manufacture of dry milk, milk powder and condensed milk and allows its export in unlimited quantity. The order is also bad because of lack of guidelines even for the purpose of export and because it nowhere lays down that the needs of the people of Rajasthan shall have to be met before permitting the export. It is thus submitted that the order does not serve the public interest in any manner. It neither assures the producer a reasonable price of his produce nor it assures the consumers milk at any fixed or reasonable price at all. Reliance is placed on M/s. Prag Ice and Oil Mills v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 1296.