Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 12 (0.22 seconds)

The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Lucknow vs U.P. Forest Corporation on 2 March, 1998

15. In order to avail the benefit of exemption under section 11/12 of the Act the activities of the trust or institution is to be charitable or for religious purposes. As pointed out in the paras hereinabove, the conditions for applicability of sections 11 and 12 of the Act are provided under section 12A of the Act and one of the conditions is that the person in receipt of the income which he claims to be for charitable purposes is to make an application for registration of the trust or the institution in the prescribed form and in the prescribed manner to the Commissioner within the stipulated period of creation of the trust or the establishment of the institution. On receipt of the application in the requisite form No.10A alongwith Instrument of creation of the trust or the institution, the procedure for registration of the trust or the institution by the Commissioner is provided under section 12AA of the Act. A d m i t t e d l y, at the time of grant of registration the Commissioner is not empowered to examine the application of income but he has to examine whether the application is made in accordance with the requirements of section 12A of the Act and whether form No.10A has been properly filled in. The Commissioner is further to examine whether the objects of the trust are charitable or not and also to satisfy himself about the genuineness of the activities of the trust or the institution. The Commissioner is not to examine the application of income at this juncture. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in CIT Vs. U.P. Forest Corporation [230 ITR 944 (SC)], held that in order to take advantage of the provisions of section 11 of the Act, the trust or the institution has to get itself registered. Whether the income of the institution can be regarded as being held for 13 charitable purposes and whether the institution is entitled to registration under section 12A of the Act, requires investigation of facts. In view thereof, section 12AA of the Act recognizes the principle laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and Commissioner under section 12AA of the Act is empowered to call for such documents or information from the trust or the institution in order to satisfy himself that the objects of trust are charitable and also about the genuineness of the activities of the trust or the institution and is also empowered to make such enquiries as he deem necessary in this regard.
Supreme Court of India Cites 24 - Cited by 92 - B N Kirpal - Full Document

The Director Of Income-Tax Exemptions vs Meenakshi Amma Endowment Trust on 12 January, 2011

The existing School at Sector 43 Chandigarh is already having around 1400 Students with complete infrastructure i.e. Land & Building, Furniture & Fixture and Other Facilities to run the school. The school is located on a plot measuring more than one acre allotted by Punjab Urban Development Authority The school building has provision for 60 classrooms, Reception area , Staff rooms , Sports room etc. and a large basement for use for various indoor activities. The school has complete infrastructure as per requirements laid down by CBSE for Computer and Science Laboratories, Library, Drinking water, Fire fighting, Play area etc. The school is Affiliated with Central Board of Secondary Education up to Senior Secondary classes and its students are appearing for the exams under the CBSE curriculum. The school is providing education to all class of students and providing Fee concessions to deserving students under category of Fatherless, Poor means, Merit students and EWS etc, to around 99 students, The school is also required to comply with t h e provisions of the Right to Education Act, 2009.
Karnataka High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 17 - Full Document

Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras vs Andhra Chamber Of Commerce on 1 October, 1964

21. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in CIT Vs. Andhra Chamber of Commerce [55 ITR 722 (SC)] had held that "If there were two distinct objects, one of which was charitable and the other not charitable and if the fund of the association could be applied for either of these purposes at the discretion of those in authority, then it cannot be held that there was any property held under trust wholly for charitable purpose".
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 265 - J C Shah - Full Document
1   2 Next