Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.26 seconds)
Kailas Maruti Gunjal vs The State Of Mah on 24 November, 2014 cites

Vithal Tukaram More & Ors vs The State Of Maharashtra on 23 July, 2002

Reliance was placed also on the case of Smt. Rashida Abdul Gani Khairadi Vs. The State of Maharashtra, reported in 2014 All MR (Cri) 244 and the case of Shivaji s/o Tukaram Patdukhe Vs. State of Maharashtra, reported in 2004 ALL MR (Cri) 3220 to argue that if a dying declaration is not read over, the same cannot be relied on. Reference was made to the case of Mohan Lal & ors. Vs. State of Haryana, reported in 2007(9) SCC 151 in support of the argument that if the relative was present at the time of recording of dying declaration, the same will be required to be discarded.
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 59 - Full Document

Rajesh Madhukar Srisundar vs State Of Maharashtra on 29 January, 2008

Learned counsel for the appellant- accused relied on the case of Rajesh Mahaiskar Vs. State, reported in 2014 ALL MR (Cri) 1023 as well as Macchidra Shelar Vs. State of Maharashtra, reported in 2014 CJ (Bom) 123; the case of Suresh s/o Arjun Dodorkar (Sonar) Vs. State of Maharashtra, reported in 2005(0) BCI 232 and Kamalbai Gorakh Koli & ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra, reported in 2011(4) Bom.C.R. (Cri.) 535 to submit that where there are more than one dying declarations, if there ::: Downloaded on - 26/11/2014 23:47:46 ::: Cri.Appeal No.679/2011 8 are material inconsistencies and contradictions, the Court cannot pick and choose one dying declaration and all the dying declarations would be required to be discarded.
Bombay High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 1 - V R Kingaonkar - Full Document

Macchidra Namdeo Shelar vs The State Of Maharashtra Ig on 10 April, 2014

Learned counsel for the appellant- accused relied on the case of Rajesh Mahaiskar Vs. State, reported in 2014 ALL MR (Cri) 1023 as well as Macchidra Shelar Vs. State of Maharashtra, reported in 2014 CJ (Bom) 123; the case of Suresh s/o Arjun Dodorkar (Sonar) Vs. State of Maharashtra, reported in 2005(0) BCI 232 and Kamalbai Gorakh Koli & ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra, reported in 2011(4) Bom.C.R. (Cri.) 535 to submit that where there are more than one dying declarations, if there ::: Downloaded on - 26/11/2014 23:47:46 ::: Cri.Appeal No.679/2011 8 are material inconsistencies and contradictions, the Court cannot pick and choose one dying declaration and all the dying declarations would be required to be discarded.
Bombay High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 1 - P V Hardas - Full Document
1