Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 31 (0.29 seconds)Section 12 in The Court-fees Act, 1870 [Entire Act]
Mohd. Ajmal vs Firm Indian Chemical Co. And Ors. on 19 September, 1977
Bhikamdas Balaram And Ors. vs Motilal Gambhirmal on 3 July, 1957
In Bhikamdas Balaram v. Motilal Gambhirmal, , the Bombay High Court held that an erroneous decision to the effect that a suit fell under a particular category for the purpose of court-fee was open to revision for the reason that the jurisdiction of the Court might be affected by the decision.
Sankaran Nadar Lekshmanan Nadar vs Varathan Nadar Krishnan Nadar And Ors. on 21 June, 1960
The same view was reiterated in Sankaran Nadar Lekshmanan Nadar v. Varathan Nadar Krishnan Nadar, .
Gupta And Co. vs Kripa Ram Brothers on 19 February, 1934
10. A Full Bench of the Allahabad High Court, however, in Gupta & Co. v. Kripa Ram Brothers, AIR 1934 All 620, held that a decision in the trial of a suit as to the amount of court-fee is not an independent proceeding and, therefore, not open to revision or challenge by the defendants.
S. Rm. Ar. S. Sp. Sathappa Chettiar vs S. Rm. Ar. Rm. Ramanathan Chettiar on 28 November, 1957
In S. Rm. Ar. S. Sp. Sathappa Chettiar v. S. Ar. Rm. Ramanathan Chettiar, , the Hon'ble Supreme Court held as under :--
Shamsher Singh vs Rajinder Prashad & Ors on 3 August, 1973
The said judgment of the Apex Court was reconsidered and approved in Shamsher Singh v. Rajinder Prashad, , observing as under :--
Vasu vs Chakki Mani on 3 July, 1961
13. The Hon'ble Supreme Court further approved the judgment of the Kerala High Court in Vasu v. Chakki Mani, , wherein it was pointed out that no revision would lie against the decision on the question of adequacy of court-fee at the instance of the defendant unless the question of court-fee involves also the question of jurisdiction of the Court.
G. Krishnamurthy And Others vs Sarangapani And Another on 25 February, 1996
In G. Krishnamurthy v. Sarangapant, , the Madras High Court held that "primarily the issue regarding court-fee is essentially a matter in between the Court and the suitor and the finding rendered by the Court cannot be said to have caused any prejudice to the defendant...."