Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 3 of 3 (0.23 seconds)Indian Council For Enviro-Legal Action ... vs Union Of India And Ors.Etc on 13 February, 1996
2. The petitioner who appeared in person before us vehemently contended that there is blatant violation of the Coastal Regulation Zone Notifications issued by the Central Government and that this Court was bound to act to protect the Coastal Environment in the light of the direction of the Supreme Court in the decision of Indian Council for Enviro-Legal Action v. Union of India and Ors., 1996 (4) JT 263. She also submitted that opposite party No. 3 did not even have an approved plan for the construction and this was clearly in violation of the Orissa Development Authorities Act and the Building Regulations. She also submitted that the Puri Municipality and Puri-Konark Development Authority are criminally negligent in not protecting the environment and in permitting violations of Coastal Regulation Zone Notifications issued by the Central Government. Hence, the Puri Municipality, the District Collector, the Puri-Konark Development Authority and the State of Orissa should be directed to remove forthwith the unauthorised constructions put up by opposite party No. 3.
Section 91 in The Orissa Development Authorities Act, 1982 [Entire Act]
1