Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 33 (0.78 seconds)
Kanhaiyalal vs Union Of India on 9 January, 2008 cites

A.K. Mehaboob And P.K. Naushad vs Intelligence Officer, Narcotics ... on 10 October, 2000

31. On behalf of the Union of India, Mr. B.B. Singh, learned Advocate, submitted that having regard to the decisions of this Court in Pon Adithan vs. Dy. Director Narcotics Bureau, (supra), A.K. Mehaboob vs. Intelligence Officer, Narcotics, (supra) and M.Prabhulal vs. The Assistant Director, Directorate of Revenue Intellegence (2003) 8 SCC 449, the appellant had been rightly convicted on his confessional statement made under Section 67 of the NDPS Act alongwith the evidence of PW 9 Suresh Badlani, Inspector in the office of the Deputy Narcotics Commissioner, Lucknow, U.P., before whom such statement had been made. Mr. Singh also submitted that even if the person was in custody at the time when he made such confessional statement, the same would not attract the bar under Article 20(3) of the Constitution, if it was made voluntarily. Mr. Singh also emphasised that in all the three cases referred to hereinabove the accused were in custody when their confessional statements were recorded under Section 67 of the NDPS Act.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 30 - K T Thomas - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next