Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.41 seconds)The Delhi Co-Operative Societies Act, 2003
Kaveri Co-Operative Group Housing ... vs Union Of India And 3 Others on 10 May, 1991
Prior to July 16, 1983, for some period of time the Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Delhi Administration, (hereinafter referred to as Registrar) was not registering any Group Housing Society under the provisions of Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 1972, presumably because there was very little chance of such societies being able to get land for construction. As a result of large scale acquisition of land in Delhi either at the instance of the Central Government or the DDA, most of the land in Delhi had been frozen. It appears that under the instructions of the Union of India, the DDA itself had been constructing for residential units on 60% land made available to it and 40% of such land was being allotted by it to different Cooperative Group Housing Societies. One of the norms which was laid down by the DDA for making allotment to Cooperative Housing Societies is that the Society should not have less than 60 and more than 300 members. On July 16, 1983, a public notice was issued by the Delhi Administration to the effect that the administration has decided to re-open the registration of Group Housing Societies. Those Societies which have membership between 60 and 300 and who did not own any residential property and the members are residents of Delhi can be registered. The application for such registration was to be accepted in the office of the Registrar between July 18, 1983 and August 17, 1983 on a prescribed form to be available from the office. Later on by a Press Note dated August 17, 1983, the period of registration was extended to August 30, 1983. Large number of persons thereafter formed Group Housing Cooperative Societies and applied for registration with the Registrar. Out of 2600 Societies which applied for registration 1406 Societies were registered. The Societies had to apply and obtain registration by satisfying all the provisions of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act and the rules framed thereunder. On March 13, 1984, the Registrar issued a public notice in the leading newspapers of Delhi to the following effect:
Prabodh Verma And Others, Etc vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Others. Etc on 27 July, 1984
Mr. Reddy has contended that it is an accepted principle consistent with natural justice that if some persons are likely to be affected on account of striking down a policy or decision enuring to their benefit, the Court should not embark upon the consideration of the propriety, correctness and validity of such policy or decision in the absence of such persons. In support of such contention, reference was made to the decision of this Court in the case of Udit Narayan Singh Malpaharia and Ors., etc. v. Additional Member, Board of Revenue, Bihar [1963] Suppl. 1 SCR p. 676 and Prabodh Verma v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors. etc. .
Indian Metals And Ferro Alloys Ltd. ... vs Collector Of Central Excise, ... on 22 November, 1990
In this connection, he has referred to the decision of this Court made in Indian Metals and Ferro Alloys Ltd., Cuttack v. The Collector of Central Excise, Bhubaneshwar . dealing with interpretation of statute with reference to contemporaneous exposition. The learned Counsels appearing in support of the applications for intervention and impleadment also made their respective submissions. Since such submissions were to the same effect as referred to hereinbefore, we do not propose to indicate such submissions separately.
1