Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.20 seconds)
Dularwa Khuntey & 9 Others vs State Of Chhattisgarh & 5 Others on 23 October, 2010 cites

Ludhiana Central Co-Operative Bank Ltd vs Amrik Singh And Ors on 19 August, 2003

8. It is a trite law that a candidate, even if, he is successful in the select list, has no indefeasible right to appointment. If the petitioner has no indefeasible right to appointment, no writ can be issued directing the respondents to give appointment to the petitioner or any other person. (See Ludhiana Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Amrik Singh and other1 and Union of India and others v. Kali Dass Batish and another2).
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 44 - Full Document

Union Of India & Ors vs Kali Dass Batish & Anr on 5 January, 2006

8. It is a trite law that a candidate, even if, he is successful in the select list, has no indefeasible right to appointment. If the petitioner has no indefeasible right to appointment, no writ can be issued directing the respondents to give appointment to the petitioner or any other person. (See Ludhiana Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. Amrik Singh and other1 and Union of India and others v. Kali Dass Batish and another2).
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 123 - Full Document
1