Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.56 seconds)
M.Murugan vs B. Kamalanabhan (Firm) on 20 October, 2017 cites

Raj Kumar vs Ajay Kumar & Anr on 18 October, 2010

5. The claimant (appellant) M.Murugan in C.M.A.No.129 of 2001 has been examined himself as PW1. His disability was evaluated by PW4 Dr.Thiagarajan, and he in his evidence read along with his Ext.P-5 certificate, has opined that the claimant's right hand has become dysfunctional and he cannot use it for any work. At the time of accident, the claimant was 20 years old and was working as a centering worker under a building contractor. Taking into consideration the nature of injury suffered by the claimant, this Court, following the dictum in Raj Kumar Vs Ajay Kumar and another [2011 ACJ 1] determines the functional disability of the victim at 90%. Reckoning the notional monthly income at Rs.2,000/- and applying multiplier of 18, the total compensation payable to the claimant on this head is (Rs.2000 X 12 X 18 X 90% =3,88,800/-) Rs.3,88,800/-. The compensation payable on the head of permanent disability is determined at Rs.1,00,000/-.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 3811 - R V Raveendran - Full Document
1