Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.22 seconds)The Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948
Section 88C in The Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Section 100 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 18 in The Limitation Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882
Baidya Nath Dutt vs Alef Jan Bibi And Ors. on 1 June, 1922
In support of his contention he relied on the decision in Baidya Nath Dutt v. Alef Janibi and others, A.I.R. 1923 Cal. 240. The head-note of the report reads as follows :---
Damadilal And Others vs Parashram And Others on 7 May, 1976
Taking into consideration the law laid down by the Supreme Court on the point and the authorities referred to by the Counsel for the parties, it is necessary to consider whether the finding recorded by the courts below on the question referred to by this Court is vitiated and needs to be corrected by this Court.
Dudh Nath Pandey (Dead) By Lrs vs Suresh Chandra Bhattasali (Dead) By Lrs on 24 April, 1986
Kharbuja Kuer v. Jangbahadur Rai and others, A.I.R. 1965 S.C. 1203; Ladli Prashad Jaiswal v. The Karnal Distillery Co. Ltd. Karnal & others, ; Madamanchi Ramappa & another v. Muthaluru Bhojappa, and Dudh Nath Pendey v. Suresh Chandra Bhatasali, . Relying on the above authorities the learned Counsel for the respondents submitted that in the present case the finding recorded by the lower Appellate Court cannot be reversed on reappreciating the evidence by this Court. He submits that there is no defect of procedure and there was no legal error on the part of the trial Court which requires to be corrected by this Court in second appeal under section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code. The learned Counsel for the Appellants on the other hand contends that the lower Appellate Court has overlooked a very material part of the evidence bearing on the question and arrived at a finding ignoring important and relevant evidence and as such this Court would be justified in reversing the finding recorded by the lower Appellate Court.
E. Mahboob Saheb vs N. Subbarayan Chowdhary & Ors on 18 December, 1981
In support of his contention he has relied on the following decision; E. Mahboob Saheb v. N. Sabbarayan Chowdhary & others, ; R. Ramachandran Ayyar v. Ramalingam Chettiar, ; Mst.