Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.30 seconds)
Krishnendra Singh vs Chairman Cum Managing Director Bharat ... on 27 February, 2020 cites

Union Of India & Ors vs Dinanath Shataram Karekar & Ors on 30 July, 1998

19. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Union of India & Others v/s Dinanath Shantaram Karekar & Others reported in (1998) 7 SCC 569, in similar circumstances when there was an endorsement on the postal envelope "not found", has held that single attempt was not sufficient and efforts should have been made for effecting the service. In the aforesaid case even newspaper publication was done, however, the newspaper was not shown to be having wide circulation or sufficiently popular and in those circumstance, the Apex Court in paragraphs - 3, 4 and 5 has held as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 141 - S S Ahmad - Full Document

State Of Punjab & Ors vs Balbir Singh Etc. Etc on 6 October, 1975

5. Lastly, in order to save the lost battle, a novel argument was raised by the learned counsel for the appellant. He contended that since the charge-sheet as also the show-cause notice, at different stages of the disciplinary proceedings, were despatched and had been sent out of the office so that no control to recall it was retained by the department, the same should be treated to have been served on the respondent. It is contended that it is the communication of the charge-sheet and the show- cause notice which is material and not its actual service upon the delinquent. For this proposition, reliance had been placed on the decision of this Court in State of Punjab and others Vs. Balbir Writ Petition No.5110/2013 18 Singh etc., AIR 1977 SC 629."
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 63 - N L Untwalia - Full Document

Nana Chudhaman Bhamkar vs Betul Nagrik Sahkari Bank Maryadit on 21 July, 2014

25. It is true that grant of backwages is not automatic. Grant of backwages depends upon various factors and in the present case, it has been argued that the petitioner is critically ill, he never got any appointment after he was compulsory retired, the family is hand to mouth, they have survived by obtaining loan from friends and relative, and Writ Petition No.5110/2013 20 therefore, keeping in view the judgment delivered by Division Bench of this Court in the case Nana Chudhaman Bhamkar v/s Betul Nagrik Sahkari Bank Maryadit reported in 2014 (4) M.P.L.J. 7, the interest of justice would be sub-served by granting backwages to the petitioner.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 4 - A Verma - Full Document
1