Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.24 seconds)Section 11 in The General Clauses Act, 1897 [Entire Act]
Bari Bhati And Chhoti Bhati Resident ... vs Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors. on 24 March, 2021
21. Before parting with this case, Ld. Counsel for the
respondent No. 2 & 6 cited the decision in the case of Residents
Welfare Association v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi, 2014 SCC Online Delhi
7212, where the issue was the legality of opening of liquor vend in CSC
(Convenient Shopping Centre) and it was held that opening of liquor
Vend in CSC was not prohibited under MPD-21 or for that matter under
Master Plan in force earlier thereto. It is not understandable as to how
this case law has any application in the present matter. To draw the
curtains finally down in the matter, the plaintiffs are prima facie unable to
RCA-13/2022 Page 16 of 18
demonstrate that defendants No. 1 to 3 are in any manner in foul with
the relevant Rules or law in proposing to set up and open a liquor outlet.
Grant or refusal of interlocutory injunction is an equitable relief, which
could only rest in the realm of sound judicial discretion, detached from
the notions of rich versus poor equation that probably swayed the
judicial discretion of the ld Sr Civil Judge while passing the impugned
order. The perception of risk, fear or alarm in the mind of the people in
the area is too flimsy to be believed. Since the appellants have
rigorously complied with the relevant law/rules on the subject so far, on
weighing of competing claims, it is manifest that the appellants have
been suffering irreparable losses and the balance of the convenience
also lies in their favour since opening of the liquor shop is also resulting
in colossal loss to the State exchequer from which various public welfare
schemes are being funded besides loss of employment opportunities for
the workers/staff to be deputed.
Rajasthan Excise Act, 1950
Section 51 in The Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
The Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957
The Delhi Excise Act, 2009
The National Capital Territory Of Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Second Act, 2009
M/S Gujarat Pottling Co.Ltd. & Ors vs The Coca Cola Co. & Ors on 4 August, 1995
14. The proposition of law governing grant of the interlocutory
injunction during the pendency of the legal proceedings was enunciated
in the case of Gujarat Bottling Co. Ltd. v. Coca Cola Co., (1995) 5
SCC 545, rightly relied upon by the Ld. Sr. Civil Judge, (West), Tis
Hazari Courts, Delhi, which reads as under:-