Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.23 seconds)The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Pushpabai Purshottam Udeshi & Ors vs Ranjit Ginning & Pressing Co. (P) Ltd. & ... on 25 March, 1977
In the case of Pushpabai Parshottam Udeshi vs. Ranjit Ginning
and Pressing Co. Pvt. Ltd. reported in AIR 1977 SC 1735, the Hon'ble
Supreme Court has observed as under:
Kerala State Electricity Board vs Kamalakshy Amma on 5 September, 1986
In the case of Kerala State Electricity Board Vs. Kamalakshy
Amma reported in 1987 ACJ 251 the Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed as
under:-
Syad Akbar vs State Of Karnataka on 25 July, 1979
This principle which was often found to be a
helping guide in the evaluation of evidence in English decisions has been recognized in India also.The Supreme
Court in Syed Akbar v. State of Karnataka, AIR 1979 SC 1848 has discussed the applicability of the maxim res
ipsa loquitur in civil as also criminal cases, in the light of the provisions of the Evidence Act."
Raj Rani & Ors vs Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd.& Ors on 6 May, 2009
18. On the other hand, counsel for the insurance company has
supported the finding of the tribunal regarding contributory negligence on the
part of the deceased and in support of his contention has placed reliance on the
decision of the apex Court (Raj Rani and others vs. Oriental Insurance Co.
Ltd. and others) in Civil Appeal Nos.3317-3318 of 2009 (Arising out of
SLP (C) Nos.27792 - 27793 of 2008) decided on 06.05.2009 as well as a
decision of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh in the case of National
Insurance Company Ltd. vs. Usha Devi and others in FAO (MVA) No.19
of 2010 decided on 09.11.2011.
National Insurance Company Ltd vs Pranay Sethi And Others on 22 June, 2022
In the case of National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Pranay Sethi and
others - 2017 ACJ 2700, the apex Court has held that while determining the
income, an addition of 40% of the established income should be added towards
future prospects where the deceased was self employed and was below the age
of 40 years. An addition of 25% should be added towards future prospects
where the deceased was between the age of 40 and 50 years.
Sarla Verma & Ors vs Delhi Transport Corp.& Anr on 15 April, 2009
According to the
Signature Not Verified
Signed by: HARIKUMAR
NAIR
Signing time: 09-07-2024
16:47:02
10 MA-352-2016
decision in the case of Sarla Verma and others vs. Delhi Transport
Corporation and another - (2009) 6 SCC 121, a multiplier of 13 must be
applied where the deceased was for the age group of 46 to 50 years. In the
present case, there are 5 claimants, therefore, 1/4th income must be deducted
towards personal expenses.
Sukhwinder Kaur vs National Insurance Company Ltd. ... on 21 January, 2020
The claimants are also entitled for spousal, parental
as well as filial consortium in the light of the verdict of the apex Court in the
case of Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur and others vs. United India
Insurance Co. Ltd. - (2021) 11 SCC 780. Thus, in view of the above
discussion, the compensation awarded by the tribunal is modified as under:
Jeyarani vs The Manager Bajaj Allianz General ... on 10 July, 2023
In support of his contentions,
counsel for the appellants/claimants has placed reliance on the decision of the
apex Court in the case of Jeyarani and another vs. Manager, Bajaj Allianz
General Insurance Co. Ltd. and another reported in 2023 ACJ 2390, in
which the apex Court has held that there has to be specific evidence regarding
negligence even if additional pillion rider was carried on the two wheeler.