Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.42 seconds)The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Sunil Kumar Sharma vs State (Nct Of Delhi) on 27 June, 2005
In
SC No.26/11 Page 11 of 22
SC No. 26/11
FIR No.10/11
PS: BHD Nagar
State Vs. Sultan @ Satte
this regard he had relied upon: Sunil Kumar Sharma Vs. State
NCT of Delhi 2011 CRI.L.J.4996, Raj Kumar @ Raju Vs. State of
Haryana 2012(1) C.C.Cases (HC) 124, Shashi Chaudhary Vs Ram
Kumar & Anr. 2011(1) JCC 520 and Pradeep @ Sonu Vs. State
(Govr. of NCT of Delhi) 2011 92) JCC 1031.
Radhu vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 14 September, 2007
It has also been observed in Radhu Vs. State of
Madhya Pradesh (2007) 12 SCC 57 as under:
Section 342 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 164 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Satbir Singh And Ors vs State Of U.P on 25 February, 2009
In this regard
he has relied upon Satbir Singh Vs. State 2004(3) JCC 1643,
Charan Singh and Another Vs. State of Haryana CA No.399 SB of
1985 decided on 1988, Shyam and another Vs. State of
Maharashtra AIR 1995 SC 2169, Bhola Ram Tiwari Vs. State of
Bihar (2003) I FemiJuris CC 449 (Jhar) and Krishan Kumar
Malik Vs. State of Harayana AIR 2011 SC 2877.