Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (1.16 seconds)Section 148 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Balaka Singh & Ors vs State Of Punjab on 16 April, 1975
(See Zwieolae Ariel v. State of
Madhya Pradesh: AIR 1954 SC 15; and Balaka Singh and
others v. The State of Punjab: AIR 1975 SC 1962).
State Of Rajasthan vs Smt. Kalki & Anr on 15 April, 1981
As
observed by this Court in State of Rajasthan v. Smt. Kalki and
another: AIR 1981 SC 1390, normal discrepancies in evidence
are those which are due to normal errors of observations,
normal errors of memory due to lapse of time, due to mental
disposition such as shock and horror at the time of
occurrence and these are always there however honest and
13
truthful a witness may be. Material discrepancies are those
which are not normal and not expected of a normal person.
Courts have to label the category to which a discrepancy may
be cateogrised.
Section 149 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Anwar Hussain vs State Of Uttar Pradesh And Anr. on 16 February, 1981
In Anwar Hussain v. The State of U.P. and Anr. (AIR
1981 SC 2073) it was observed that even if there is insufficient
light, a witness can identify a person, with whom he is fairly
acquainted or is in intimate terms, from his voice, gaits,
features etc. Therefore, there is nothing to discard the
9
evidence of PW8 so far as his claim to have recognized the
appellant is concerned.
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Zwinglee Ariel vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 3 December, 1952
(See Zwieolae Ariel v. State of
Madhya Pradesh: AIR 1954 SC 15; and Balaka Singh and
others v. The State of Punjab: AIR 1975 SC 1962).
1