Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.22 seconds)Jai Prakash vs Union Of India & Anr. on 1 February, 2012
14. Later by order dated 16.05.2012, a Bench of this Court noted
that in view of the judgment delivered in LA Appeal No.115/2011 (Jai
Prakash vs. Union of India & Anr.) on 01.02.2012, the present appeal
also had to be dismissed. However, since there was no appearance on
behalf of the appellant on that date as well, the appeal was dismissed
in default.
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Ramlal, Motilal And Chhotelal vs Rewa Coalfields Ltd on 4 May, 1961
In Ramlal vs. Rewa Coalfields Ltd., AIR 1962 SC 361, the
Supreme Court, while interpreting Section 5 of the Limitation Act,
laid down the following proposition:
Collector Land Acquisition, Anantnag & ... vs Mst. Katiji & Ors on 19 February, 1987
In Collector, Land Acquisition, Anantnag v. Mst. Katiji,
(1987) SCC 107, the Supreme Court made a significant departure
from the earlier judgments and observed:
N. Balakrishnan vs M. Krishnamurthy on 3 September, 1998
In N. Balakrishnan v. M. Krishnamurthy, (1998) 7 SCC 123,
the Supreme Court expanded the scope and ambit of law of limitation
and elucidated as follows:
P.K. Ramachandran vs State Of Kerala & Anr on 19 September, 1997
In P.K. Ramachandran v. State of Kerala, (1997) 7 SCC 556,
the Supreme Court while reversing the order passed by High Court
which had condoned 565 days delay in filing an appeal by the State
against the decree of the Sub- Court in an arbitration application,
observed that the law of limitation may harshly affect a particular
party but it has to be applied with all its rigour when the statute so
prescribes and the Courts have no power to extend the period of
limitation on equitable grounds.
State Of Nagaland vs Lipok Ao & Ors on 1 April, 2005
In State of Nagaland v. Lipok AO, AIR 2005 SC 2191, the
Supreme Court has observed that justice-oriented approach should be
adopted. Unless a pragmatic view is taken, injustice is bound to occur.
Imrat Lal And Others vs Land Acquisition Collector And Others on 5 September, 2011
In
this context, it would be relevant to quote the following observations
from the judgment delivered in Imrant Lal vs. Collector (LA): (2014)
14 SCC 133: