Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.21 seconds)Section 10 in The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 [Entire Act]
O.P. Kathpalia vs Lakhmir Singh (Dead) And Ors. on 23 July, 1984
The aforesaid case of Chandra Mani had considered in detail various judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court i.e. Collector of Land Acquisition v. Katiji, 1987(2) SCC 107; O.P. Katpalia v. Lakhmir Singh, 1984 (4) SCC 66; Brij Inder Singh v. Kanshi Ram, AIR 1917 Privy Council 156; G. Rame Gowda v. Special Land Acquisition Officer, 1988(2) SCC 142 and host of other judgments.
H.H. Brij Indar Singh vs Lala Kanshi Ram on 19 July, 1917
The aforesaid case of Chandra Mani had considered in detail various judgments of the Hon'ble Supreme Court i.e. Collector of Land Acquisition v. Katiji, 1987(2) SCC 107; O.P. Katpalia v. Lakhmir Singh, 1984 (4) SCC 66; Brij Inder Singh v. Kanshi Ram, AIR 1917 Privy Council 156; G. Rame Gowda v. Special Land Acquisition Officer, 1988(2) SCC 142 and host of other judgments.
Meera Bhanja vs Nirmala Kumari Choudhury on 16 November, 1994
13. Learned Counsel for the respondents herein, has strenuously contended that unless there is an error apparent on the fact of the record which strikes one on mere looking at the record and would not require any long drawn reasoning, the jurisdiction of this Tribunal to seek review cannot be invoked. Our attention has been drawn in this respect to a judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in 1995( 1) SCC 170, Meera Bhanja v. Nirmala Kumari Choudhary, which reads as under:
Aribam Tuleshwar Sharma vs Aribam Pishak Sharma And Ors. on 25 January, 1979
In the aforesaid case the Hon'ble Supreme Court after noticing the observations made in Aribam Tuleshwar Sharma v. Aribam Pishak Sharma, (1979) 4 SCC 389 (SCC p. 390 para 3) further held as under:
Satyanarayan Laxminarayan Hegde And ... vs Millikarjun Bhavanappa Tirumale on 25 September, 1959
The power of review is not to be confused with the appellate power which may enable an Appellate Court to correct all minor errors committed by the subordinate Court, is the settled law laid down by the Supreme Court. In AIR 1975 SC 1500, SOW.
Sow Chandra Kanta And Another vs Sheik Habib on 13 March, 1975
Chandra Kanta and Anr. v. Sheik Habib, the Hon'ble Supreme Court observed as follows:
State Of Haryana vs Chandra Mani & Ors on 30 January, 1996
5. Before we proceed to deal with R.A., we would like to deal with the M.A. first. We have heard learned Counsel for parties at length on M.A. No. 384/02. Learned Counsel for the petitioners has drawn our attention to 1996(3) SCC 132, State of Haryana v. Chandra Mani and Ors., and contended that in the facts and circumstances of the present case, the aforesaid delay, which is not intentional and is bona fide, deserves to be condoned. It would be relevant to quote para 11 of the said judgment which reads as under: