Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.22 seconds)

Union Of India vs Manpreet Singh Poonam on 8 March, 2022

12. It is further argued that Petitioner cannot claim promotion from 1997 despite the existence of vacancies in the said year, since as per the RRs, 8 years' experience as Assistant Advisor is required for promotion to the post of Advisor and further three years is required as Advisor to be eligible for promotion to the post of Senior Advisor, which clearly the Petitioner Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:KAMAL KUMAR W.P.(C) 10451/2006 Page 4 of 9 Signing Date:05.01.2025 23:18:23 does not complete in 1997. An Assistant Advisor can be promoted as Senior Advisor but that is on completion of eleven years, which Petitioner completed much later in 2002. It is strenuously argued that even otherwise, Petitioner cannot agitate the issue of non-promotion as he sought voluntary retirement under the VRS introduced by IIC and upon such acceptance on 27.04.2005, his jural relationship ceased with IIC. Reliance is placed on the judgment of the Supreme Court in Union of India and Another v. Manpreet Singh Poonam and Others, (2022) 6 SCC 105, to assert that having taken Voluntary Retirement, it is not open to an employee to agitate past claims as the employer-employee relationship ceases.
Supreme Court of India Cites 12 - Cited by 31 - M M Sundresh - Full Document

Ravikumar Dhansukhlal Maheta vs High Court Of Gujarat on 12 May, 2023

13. Learned counsel further places reliance on the judgement in Ravikumar Dhansukhlal Maheta and Another v. High Court of Gujarat and Others State of Gujarat, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 972, to buttress the legal submission that no Government servant can claim promotion as a matter of right because the Constitution does not prescribe criteria for filling seats in promotional posts.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 4 - M R Shah - Full Document
1