Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.18 seconds)

The State Of Uttar Pradesh vs Sudhir Kumar Singh on 16 October, 2020

9. The petitioners strongly rely on the plea of violation of natural justice. That contention must be tested on settled principles. The law on this aspect now stands clarified by the Supreme Court in State of U.P. v. Sudhir Kumar Singh, (2021) 19 SCC 706. The Supreme Court has explained that natural justice is not a rigid formula. It is not a mechanical ritual. A mere allegation of breach does not invalidate an order. The Court must examine whether real prejudice has been caused. The test is not technical non-compliance. The test is whether the party suffered actual disadvantage. The Court is entitled to examine the record and determine whether the outcome would have been different had a fuller hearing been granted.
Supreme Court of India Cites 56 - Cited by 239 - R F Nariman - Full Document

Mohd. Shafiq Khan & Ors. Etc vs Competent Authority & Ors. Etc on 27 November, 1987

16. The nature and legal effect of an order passed under Section 11 of MOFA must be understood in its proper perspective. The Division Bench of this Court in Zainul Abedin Yusufali Massawalla 7 ::: Uploaded on - 11/02/2026 ::: Downloaded on - 11/02/2026 20:32:56 ::: 55-wp10985-2022 with ia10714-2024.doc and others versus Competent Authority, 2016 SCC OnLine Bom 6028, has clearly explained that a deemed conveyance order transfers only such right, title and interest as the promoter in fact possesses. It does not create a higher or independent title. It does not enlarge the rights of the society beyond what the promoter himself lawfully holds.
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 2 - E S Venkataramiah - Full Document
1