Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.20 seconds)
Shri Subrata Bachar vs The Hon'Ble Lt. Governor And Others on 16 December, 2025 cites

Tej Prakash Pathak & Ors vs Rajasthan High Court & Ors on 20 March, 2013

27. A Coordinate Bench in its order relied upon in respect of the recruitment and promotion in the Port Blair Municipal Council which is also the office herein in the present case observed that the office memorandum dated 10th April, 1989 also categorically states that 'a vacancy shall be filled in accordance with the recruitment rules in force on the date of vacancy'. In view thereof, the petitioner's eligibility for promotion is not in doubt. The only reason for which such promotion has been withheld appears to be that a decision pertaining to amendment of the existing RRs is under consideration of the competent authority. Such reasoning is not acceptable to this Court since even if the RRs are amended, the same would be prospective in nature and such 15 amendment cannot render the petitioner ineligible as the same shall not apply to the petitioner [R. Ranjith Singh (Supra) and Tej Prakash Pathak (Supra)].
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 150 - Full Document

R. Ranjith Singh vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 10 July, 2023

27. A Coordinate Bench in its order relied upon in respect of the recruitment and promotion in the Port Blair Municipal Council which is also the office herein in the present case observed that the office memorandum dated 10th April, 1989 also categorically states that 'a vacancy shall be filled in accordance with the recruitment rules in force on the date of vacancy'. In view thereof, the petitioner's eligibility for promotion is not in doubt. The only reason for which such promotion has been withheld appears to be that a decision pertaining to amendment of the existing RRs is under consideration of the competent authority. Such reasoning is not acceptable to this Court since even if the RRs are amended, the same would be prospective in nature and such 15 amendment cannot render the petitioner ineligible as the same shall not apply to the petitioner [R. Ranjith Singh (Supra) and Tej Prakash Pathak (Supra)].
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1