Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.19 seconds)
State vs Saroj on 13 December, 2023 cites

State Of U.P. & Ors vs Saroj Kumar Sinha on 2 February, 2010

".....The report prepared by the officers of the Electricity Board is an act done in discharge of their duties and could not be straightway reflected or disbelieved unless and until there was definite and cogent material on record to arrive at such a finding. The inspection report is a document prepared in exercise of his official duty by the officers of the corporation. Once an act is done in accordance with law, the presumption is in favour of FIR No. 1108/2021 , State Vs. Saroj 13 of 15 such act or document and not against the same. Thus there was specific onus upon the consumer to rebut by leading proper and cogent evidence that the report prepared by the officers was not correct....".
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 718 - S S Nijjar - Full Document

Sushil Sharma vs Bses Rajdhani Power Ltd. & Anr. on 22 December, 2010

In the case titled as 'Sushil Sharma vs BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd.' in Crl. Appeal No.1060/10, decided on 22.12.2010, the Hon'ble Delhi High Court has held that non-examination of independent/public witness is no infirmity and the members of the inspection team who deposed in the court, were having no enmity against the appellant and their testimonies are trustworthy. In the present case also, there is no material to show that the TPDDL officials were inimical to the accused. Thus, non- joining of public witness is not fatal to the prosecution case.
Delhi High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 219 - S N Dhingra - Full Document

Punjab State Electricity Board & Anr vs Ashwani Kumar on 8 July, 2010

19. Moreover, Hon'ble Supreme Court in case titled as 'Punjab State Electricity Board & Ors. vs. Ashwani Kumar, 2010 (7) SCC 569' has observed that inspection report is a document prepared in exercise of his official duty by the officers and once an act is done in accordance with law the presumption of authenticity rest with the documents so prepared. The relevant extract of the same is produced below for ready reference:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 275 - S Kumar - Full Document
1