Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.63 seconds)Section 3 in The Andhra Pradesh Prevention Of Dangerous Activities Of Bootleggers, Dacoits, Drug-Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders And Land-Grabbers Act, 1986. [Entire Act]
Champion R. Sangma vs State Of Meghalaya on 22 May, 2015
In this context, it would be appropriate
to refer to the Judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Champion
R.Sangma v. State of Meghalaya5, wherein, the Hon'ble Supreme
Court while dealing with the provisions of the Preventive detention,
at paragraphs-13 and 14 held as follows:
Smt.Vasnthu Sumalatha vs 1. State Of Andhra Pradesh Rep. By Its ... on 29 September, 2015
"14. From the ratio in the decision, it is clear that non-supply of
conditional bail orders by the sponsoring authority to the
detaining authority and failure to refer to the same in the order
of detention and grounds of detention, and non- consideration of
such vital and relevant material, invalidates the detention order.
The law laid down in Vasanthu Sumalatha v. State of Andhra
Pradesh, 2016 (2) ALD (Crl.) 156, which was recently affirmed by
us in W.P.No.4805/2016 to the effect that failure to supply
documents relied upon by the detaining authority would result in
denying an opportunity to make an effective representation as
guaranteed under Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India,
would squarely apply to the instant case."