Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.54 seconds)
Shri Ravinandan Goel vs Shri Raminder Kumar Goel (Deceased) on 25 July, 2017 cites

Bhoop Singh vs Ram Singh Major & Ors on 11 September, 1995

The matter was settled between the parties and a joint application for compromise was filed and Hon'ble High Court vide Order dated 08.05.1995 passed a compromise decree Ex.PW-1/C. It was further argued that by virtue of the said compromise decree the rights of the parties were settled and judgment of the first Ravinandan Goel VS Raminder Kumar Goel & Ors.                                                                                        Page No.  16/23 appellate Court and trial Court merged into the compromise decree. Counsel for the defendants has argued that the said compromise decree required compulsory registration under Section 17(2) (vi) of the Indian Registration Act. The said compromise decree was not got registered by the plaintiffs nor it was engrossed on requisite stamp papers within the prescribed period of limitation of 12 years and hence, the said compromise decree became unenforceable. Counsel for the defendants has placed reliance on the judgments of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Bhoop Singh Vs. Ram Singh Major AIR 1996 SC 196; Phoolpatti & Anr. Vs. Ram Singh & Anr. I (2015) SLT 408 and K Raghunandan Vs. Ali Hussain Sabir & Ors. AIR 2008 SC 2337 in support of his arguments.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 234 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document

Bachan Singh vs Kartar Singh And Ors. on 31 July, 2001

In Bachan Singh' case(Supra), Hon'ble Supreme Court held that a consent decree passed by the Court declaring a party owner of the land does not require compulsory registration. However, the facts of this case are distinguishable from the facts of the present case. In Bachan Singh's Case the defendant had admitted the claim of the plaintiff in an earlier suit and the said suit was decreed by the Ld. Trial Court on the basis of the said admission and no appeal was preferred by any of parties against the judgment of the Ld. Trial Court. In the second suit, the defendants tried to challenge the judgment in the first suit on the ground that it was obtained by fraud but the Hon'ble Court dismissed the said appeal on the ground that earlier suit was based on consent decree on the basis of admission in the written statement which did not require any registration.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 49 - V N Khare - Full Document
1