Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.26 seconds)Section 34 in The Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 [Entire Act]
The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Section 17 in The Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 [Entire Act]
The Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008
Section 8 in The Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 [Entire Act]
Section 37 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 16 in The Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 [Entire Act]
Section 11 in The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [Entire Act]
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited vs Applied Electronics Ltd. & Anr. on 28 July, 2014
57. For example, the Supreme Court, in Mahanagar (supra), held that no
cross objection can be filed under Order XLI Rule 22 of the CPC in an
appeal under Section 37. Such filing is a procedural right conferred by
the CPC; however, Order XLI Rule 22 has another component which is
an implicit feature in any appellate jurisdiction, which cannot be said
to be mandatorily barred even in a proceeding under Section 37 of the
1996 Act; such feature being that any respondent, though he may not
have appealed from any part of the decree, may not only support the
decree but also state that the finding against him in the court below in
respect of any issue ought to have been held in his favour.