Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 15 (0.51 seconds)Section 411 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 360 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
State Of U.P vs Anil Singh on 26 August, 1988
Sohrab
v. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1972 SC 2020 at p. 2024 and State of U.P.
v. Anil Singh, AIR 1988 SC 1998.
Mohan Singh vs Prem Singh And Anr on 1 October, 2002
30. This above statement is admissible in evidence against the accused in
view of sub clause 4 of section 313 Cr.P.C. ( (Mohan Singh v. Prem Singh,
(SC) 2002(4)
R.C.R.(Criminal) 842, Rattan Singh v. State of Himachal
Pradesh, (SC) 1997 A.I.R. (SC) 768, Sh. Mith kalitha V. State of Assam 2006
Cr.l.J. 2570, State of Rajasthan V. Ganesh Dass 1995 Cr.L.J. 25 (Raj.),
Bishwas Prasad Sinha V. State of Assam 2007 (1) Crimes 147 (SC),
Anthoney Disuja V State of Karnataka AIR 2003 SC 258, State of H.P. V.
Wazir Chand AIR 1978 SC 315) and it goes onto prove the presence of the
accused at the date, time and spot of the incident. It also proves that she was
apprehended by complainant Ms. Sarita Kapoor and other neighborhood people
and later on handed over to the police.