Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 10 (0.24 seconds)

State Rep. By Inspector Of Police & Ors vs N.M.T. Joy Immaculate on 5 May, 2004

14. He further contends that the respondent/CBI had given notices to the petitioner under Section 160 CrPC, however, the same were subsequently withdrawn which shows the ill-intent of the Investigation Agency. He submits that Section 160 CrPC applies to witnesses or possible witnesses and attendance of an accused cannot be required by giving such a notice. He places reliance on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in State vs. N.M.T. Joy Immaculate, 2004 SCC OnLine SC 635.
Supreme Court of India Cites 21 - Cited by 60 - G P Mathur - Full Document
1