Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.20 seconds)Section 29 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 397 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 228 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 401 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Amar Singh Ramjibhai Barot vs State Of Gujarat on 19 September, 2005
17. The Hon'ble Supreme Court has considered the cited judgment of
Amarsingh (Supra) when the appeal has been preferred i.e., when evidence of
the witnesses were before the court.
Manendra Prasad Tiwari vs Amit Kumar Tiwari on 12 August, 2022
In relation to exercise of power under Section 397 or Section 482 of Cr.P.C.
by the Courts while deciding a petition seeking discharge or quashing of charge
framed by the Trial Court, the Hon'ble Apex Court in Manendra Prasad
Tiwari v. Amit Kumar Tiwari and Anr. 2022 SCC OnLine SC 1057 has
reiterated the well-settled law, with the following observations:
State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990
12. The law has been settled that parameters for invoking the inherent
jurisdiction of the Court to quash the criminal proceedings under Section 528
of the BNSS (corresponding to Section 482 Cr.P.C.) are limited and the same
has to be exercised in rarest of rare cases and not in casual manner. The
aforesaid proposition of law is well settled by Apex Court in "State of
Haryana vs Bhajan Lal" reported in AIR 1992 SC 604, wherein a caution
has been given to the constitutional courts exercising the powers given under
Section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code.
Prashant Bharti vs State Of Nct Of Delhi on 23 January, 2013
In Prashant Bharti vs State (NCT of Delhi), reported in (2013) 9
SCC 293, wherein following has been held: