Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.34 seconds)Section 138 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 139 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
Section 118 in The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 [Entire Act]
Section 114 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Basalingappa vs Mudibasappa on 9 April, 2019
28. Elaborating further on this point, the Apex Court in
Basalingappa v. Mudibasappa4 summarised the law. The
following was laid down in para 25: (SCC p. 433434)
"25. We have noticed the ratio laid down by this Court
in the above cases on sections 118(a) and 139, we now
summarise the principles enumerated by this Court in
following manner:
M/S Kumar Exports vs M/S Sharma Carpets on 16 December, 2008
In the case of Kumar Exports Vs. Sharma Carpets6, it
was held:
V.S.Yadav vs Reena on 21 September, 2010
51. That a bare denial by the Accused in his notice of
accusation and in his examination under Sec313 Cr.P.C
read with Sec281 Cr.P.C would not assume the character
of defence evidence as held in V.S Yadav v. Reena . Hence,
the Accused has not been able to rebut the presumption
of service of legal demand notice. Resultantly, the said
ingredient stands fulfilled as against the Accused.