Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.20 seconds)Section 306 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
State Of Kerala And Ors vs S.Unnikrishnan Nair And Ors on 13 August, 2015
In State of Kerala v. S. Unnikrishnan Nair, decided on 13.8.2015, Law Finder Doc Id #
701516, a two-judge bench of Hon'ble Supreme Court holds,
[18]. Coming to the case at hand, as we have stated earlier, the suicide note
really does not state about any continuous conduct of harassment and, in any
case, the facts and circumstances are quite different. In such a situation, we are
disposed to think that the High Court is justified in quashing the proceeding, for
it is an accepted position in law that where no prima facie case is made out
against the accused, then the High Court is obliged in law to exercise the
jurisdiction under section 482 of the Code and quash the proceedings.
Geo Varghese vs The State Of Rajasthan on 5 October, 2021
10. The decisions in Geo Varghese and Unnikrishnan supra were on merits and not on compromise; hence not applicable in the present case, where the quashing is sought on compromise and not on merits.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
V.P. Shrivastava vs Indian Explosives Ltd. & Ors on 24 September, 2010
See V.P.
Shrivastava v. Indian Explosives Limited and Others, (2010) 10 SCC 361.
Section 482 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
1