Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.21 seconds)
Prashant Anuprai Purohit vs Logic Academy Pvt Ltd on 28 November, 2023 cites

Sajjan Singh vs State Of Rajasthan(With Connected ... on 30 October, 1964

4. It is well settled that a party is not entitled to seek a review of a judgment delivered by this Court merely for the purpose of a rehearing and a fresh decision of the case. The normal principle is that a judgment pronounced by Nishita RA 07/23 Page 5 of 10 the Court is final, and departure from that principle is justified only when circumstances of a substantial and compelling character make it necessary to do so. Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan.(1) For instance, if the attention of the Court is not drawn to a material statutory provision during the original hearing, the Court will review its judgment.
Supreme Court of India Cites 51 - Cited by 249 - P B Gajendragadkar - Full Document

Chandrakanta Bal Munshi vs Saharali Sheikh And Ors. on 4 January, 1938

145. In a civil proceeding, an application for review is entertained only on a ground mentioned in XLVII rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and in a criminal proceeding on the ground of an error apparent on the face of the record. (Order XL rule 1, Supreme Court Rules, 1966). But whatever the nature of the proceeding, it is beyond dispute that a review proceeding cannot be equated with the original hearing of the case, and the finality of the judgment delivered by the Court will not be reconsidered except "where a glaring omission or patent mistake or like grave error has crept in earlier by judicial fallibility."ChandraKanta v. Sheikh Habib.
Calcutta High Court Cites 2 - Cited by 15 - Full Document
1   2 Next