Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 24 (0.25 seconds)Section 34 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 60 in The Transfer Of Property Act, 1882 [Entire Act]
Section 17 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 171 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 19 in The Securitisation And Reconstruction Of Financial Assets And Enforcement Of Security Interest Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
State Bank Of India And Anr Through ... vs Mrs. Jayanthi And Ors on 28 May, 2019
In the Judgement of the Division
Bench of this Court reported in 2011 (2) CTC 465 - State Bank of India Vs.
Jayanthi and others, the facts and issue in that case were more or less
similar to the facts of the present case. In that Judgement the Bench had
held that when the contract / mortgage has been created for a specific
purpose and for a specific loan and the contract is self contained, then the
terms and conditions of that contract was binding on both the borrower as
well as the Bank mutually. Once the deposit of title deed through which a
mortgage deed is created for a specific loan, then the bank cannot exercise
general lien as provided under Section 171 of the Contract Act, in respect of
that property.
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Indian Bank vs Abs Marine Products Pvt. Ltd on 18 April, 2006
“i) (2006) 5 SCC 72 – Indian Bank Vs. ABS Marine Products (P)
Ltd.