Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 21 (0.29 seconds)
State vs Ashok Yadav 1. Ashok Yadav, on 28 November, 2019 cites

Bihar State Govt.Sec.Scl.Teachers ... vs Ashok Kumar Sinha & Ors on 7 May, 2014

12. PW­6 Chander Pal has deposed that on 24.08.98 he was posted at Inspector CBCID Meerut, U.P. On that day he received this case file for investigation and on receipt of same he gone through the file. He also received the case diary from the office of circle office Pilakhua, Ghaziabad. During the investigation he recorded S.C. No. 483/2017 State Vs. Ashok and others page 9 of 27 statement of Tek Chand, Kiran Singh, Satish, Shree, Suraj Singh, Tej Pal, Brijesh, Khajjan, Neelu, Inderjeet and Sohan Pal. During the investigation he also collected documents and verified the facts regarding the previous enmity between the complainant and accused persons. He also recorded the statement of owner of the maruti car bearing no. DL­7C­4956. He mentioned these facts in the case diary. Thereafter he transferred from CBCID and he deposed the case file with the case diary in CBCID office.
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 242 - A K Sikri - Full Document

Sadhu Singh Roda S/O Buta Singh Etc vs State Of Punjab on 25 January, 1984

29. I have given a thoughtful consideration to the record and the arguments advanced. It is a settled proposition of law that to bring home conviction, the prosecution has to establish its case beyond the pale of reasonable doubt by establishing an unbroken chains of events, leading to commission of the offence. It is further a settled proposition of law that once this chain is broken or a plausible theory of another possibility is shown, the accused becomes entitled to the benefit of doubt which ultimately leads to his/her acquittal. 1997 (3) Crimes 55 titled Sadhu Singh Vs State of Punjab.
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 3880 - V D Tulzapurkar - Full Document
1   2 3 Next