Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.23 seconds)Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 401 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Bindeshwari Prasad Singh @ B.P. Singh ... vs State Of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) on 13 August, 2002
Hon'ble Apex Court, in the matter of Bindeshwari Prasad
Singh Vs. State of Bihar reported in 2002(6) SCC 560 in paras 13 and
14 has observed as under: -
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 397 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Johar And Others vs Mangal Prasad And Another on 30 January, 2008
Hon'ble Apex Court, in the matter of Johar Vs. Mangal
Prasad reported in 2008(3) SCC 423 in para 19 has held as under: -
Yakub And Anr. vs State Of Haryana on 6 December, 1995
Learned Sessions Judge after going through the evidence of
the prosecution witnesses, came to the conclusion that it was a blind
murder and, in fact, on coming to know about the occurrence, PW Attar
Singh accompanied by Telu Ram and others went to the spot and found
the deceased lying in a water course with face downward. However, the
extra judicial confession statement purported to be suffered by the
CRR No.1343 of 2008
-4-
accused to Jagpal Singh PW11 has been made after 11 days. The extra
judicial confession is a weak type of evidence and as such no reliance
can be placed on the same. The learned trial Court has rightly placed
reliance upon the judgments in the matter of Yakub and another Vs.
State of Haryana, 1996(3) RCR 474, Surinder Kumar Vs. State of
Punjab, 1999(1) Criminal Court Judgments 39, Tara Chand Vs. State
of Haryana, 2001(2) Criminal Court Judgments, 7 and Madan Mohan
@ David Vs. State of Haryana, 1997(1) RCR 713 in support of its
conclusion.
1