State Of Uttar Pradesh & Ors vs Harish Chandra Singh on 17 January, 1969
8 In this case, so far as the witnesses examined are concerned,
PW1 Sh. Kewal Kumar Kohli and PW2 Smt. Rita Kohli are the
material witnesses of the prosecution. As discussed above, the
testimony of PW1 is not convincing to a reasonable extent. He has
not been able to state the incident elaborately and specifically. Being
complainant and allegedly the injured in this case, his testimony must
reflect a comprehensive and sensible story which is not available in
the present case. It is also to be noted that during the course of crossÂ
Case No. 477/2/02 State Vs. Harish 4/6
examination conducted on behalf of the accused, he has deposed that
he does not remember who caused him hurt.