Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.15 seconds)
Ram Chander vs Hpgcl Thru M.D. And Ors on 18 March, 2015 cites

Rohtash Kumar Nehra And Another vs Union Of India And Others on 15 July, 2010

Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the matter is no longer res-integra. He has relied upon the decisions of this Court in Rohtash Kumar Nehra and another vs Union of India and others, CWP No.12505 of 2009, decided on 15.7.2010, Lal Chand Jangra vs State of Haryana and others, CWP No.7955 of 2010, decided on 21.12.2010, and Haryana Vidyut Parsaran Nigam Limited vs Sant Kumar and others, LPA No.1493 of 2011, decided on 27.9.2011. In all these judgments, different Benches of this Court have held that it was incumbent upon the respondents therein to recognize the qualification SUNITA NAGPAL 2015.04.06 15:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity y of this document Chandigarh C.W.P No. 10974 of 2012 (O&M) 3 of such ex-servicemen (as the petitioners) as being equivalent to degree. The decision in LPA No.1493 of2011 (supra) was carried by the respondents thereinto the Hon'ble Supreme Court and their Lordships dismissed the Special Leave Petition. Counsel for the respondents has not been able to cite any contrary judgment.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 9 - S Kant - Full Document

Haryana Vidyut Parsaran Nigam Limited vs Sant Kumar And Others on 27 September, 2011

Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the matter is no longer res-integra. He has relied upon the decisions of this Court in Rohtash Kumar Nehra and another vs Union of India and others, CWP No.12505 of 2009, decided on 15.7.2010, Lal Chand Jangra vs State of Haryana and others, CWP No.7955 of 2010, decided on 21.12.2010, and Haryana Vidyut Parsaran Nigam Limited vs Sant Kumar and others, LPA No.1493 of 2011, decided on 27.9.2011. In all these judgments, different Benches of this Court have held that it was incumbent upon the respondents therein to recognize the qualification SUNITA NAGPAL 2015.04.06 15:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity y of this document Chandigarh C.W.P No. 10974 of 2012 (O&M) 3 of such ex-servicemen (as the petitioners) as being equivalent to degree. The decision in LPA No.1493 of2011 (supra) was carried by the respondents thereinto the Hon'ble Supreme Court and their Lordships dismissed the Special Leave Petition. Counsel for the respondents has not been able to cite any contrary judgment.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 5 - Full Document

Sanjeev Jangra Son Of Sh. Chander Mal ... vs State Of Haryana Through The Financial ... on 5 September, 2012

Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that the matter is no longer res-integra. He has relied upon the decisions of this Court in Rohtash Kumar Nehra and another vs Union of India and others, CWP No.12505 of 2009, decided on 15.7.2010, Lal Chand Jangra vs State of Haryana and others, CWP No.7955 of 2010, decided on 21.12.2010, and Haryana Vidyut Parsaran Nigam Limited vs Sant Kumar and others, LPA No.1493 of 2011, decided on 27.9.2011. In all these judgments, different Benches of this Court have held that it was incumbent upon the respondents therein to recognize the qualification SUNITA NAGPAL 2015.04.06 15:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity y of this document Chandigarh C.W.P No. 10974 of 2012 (O&M) 3 of such ex-servicemen (as the petitioners) as being equivalent to degree. The decision in LPA No.1493 of2011 (supra) was carried by the respondents thereinto the Hon'ble Supreme Court and their Lordships dismissed the Special Leave Petition. Counsel for the respondents has not been able to cite any contrary judgment.
Punjab-Haryana High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 5 - K Kannan - Full Document
1