Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (1.20 seconds)Section 18 in The Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Explosive Substances Act, 1908 [Entire Act]
Y.S.Jagan Mohan Reddy vs C.B.I on 9 May, 2013
In case titled "Y. S. Jagan Mohan Reddy Vs Central Bureau of
Investigation" reported in AIR 2013 SC 1933, wherein the Supreme Court has
held that bail in economic offences requires different approach by the Court.
Paragraph Nos. 13, 15 & 16 of the aforementioned judgment is reproduced
hereunder for facility of reference:-
Abdul Azeez P V And Ors vs National Investigation Agency on 14 November, 2014
17. The Apex Court in Abdul Azeez P.V. and Ors. Vs National
Investigating Agency (NIA) reported in 2014 (16) SCC 543, wherein the
18 Bail App Nos. 170/2019 & 192/2019
factual matrix of the case was that after completion of the investigation,
charge-sheet was filed by NIA on 19-10-2013, which inter alia stated the
allegations against each of the petitioners and the materials on the basis of
which such allegations were levelled. It also stated in paragraphs 18.2 and 18.3
that requisite sanction under Sections 18 and 18A of the UAPA was accorded
by the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, vide order dated
17.10.2013 and also that sanction under Section 7 of the Explosive Substances
Act was accorded by the District Magistrate, Kannur vide his order dated
15.10.2013. In paragraph 18.6 of the charge- sheet it was stated to the
following effect:
K. Veeraswami vs Union Of India And Others on 25 July, 1991
18. Learned State counsel would further submit, that the final report
submitted u/s 173 (2) CrPC is an intimation to the Magistrate that sufficient
evidence as to the commission of offence has been collected to enable the
Magistrate to take cognizance and to proceed with the enquiry and trial of the
case. If the charge-sheet contains all necessary facts to enable the Magistrate to
take cognizance, such final report or charge-sheet cannot be discarded only
because some facts of the matter require further investigation. State counsel has
also placed reliance on paragraph 76 of the Constitution Bench Judgment of the
Apex Court in K. Veeraswami Vs Union of India and Ors., reported in
(1991) 3 SCC 655, which reads as under :-
P. Chidambaram vs Directorate Of Enforcement on 5 September, 2019
11. Learned counsel for the applicants has placed reliance upon case
titled "P. Chidambaram Vs Directorate of Enforcement" bearing Criminal
Appeal No. 1831/2019, wherein the Apex Court has granted bail to P.
Chidambaram under Section 3 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.