Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.25 seconds)Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 107 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 116 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Maheshwar Tigga vs The State Of Jharkhand on 28 September, 2020
In a recent decision, the Apex Court in Maheshwar Tigga vs State of Jharkhand reported in (2020) 10 SCC 108 has held that the circumstances not put to an accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C cannot be used against him and must be excluded from consideration. Considering the importance of putting all relevant questions to the accused under Section 313 Cr.P.C., it was held therein to be an essential part of fair trial, basic to the principles of natural justice.
Nawal Kishore Verma & Anr vs State Of Bihar & Ors on 12 September, 2013
In Naval Kishore (supra) the Apex Court had deprecated the practice of putting entire evidence against the accused in a single question. It was held in para-'5' that:
Gura Singh vs The State Of Rajasthan on 6 December, 2000
25. Any portion of evidence consistent with the case of the prosecution or defence version can be relied upon. The statement particularly examination-in-chief in so far as it supports the case of the prosecution is admissible and can be relied upon by the Court. Reference: Gura Singh vs State of Rajasthan reported in (2001) 2 SCC 205 ; Bhagwan Singh vs State of Haryana reported in 1976 AIR 202; Ramesh Harijan vs State of Uttar Pradesh reported in (2012) 5 SCC 777; Haradhan Das vs State of West Bengal reported in (2013) 2 SCC 197; Lahu Kamlakar Patil and another vs State of Maharashtra reported in (2013) 6 SCC 417;