Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.20 seconds)Animal And Environment Legal Defence ... vs Union Of India And Ors on 5 March, 1997
"12. Apart from the above we may also refer to Article 51-A(g) of the Constitution which makes it a fundamental duty of every citizen "to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life." This duty can be enforced by the Court, vide Animal and Environment Legal Defence Fund vs. Union of India."
Virendra Gaur And Ors vs State Of Haryana And Ors on 24 November, 1994
"42. However, some of the environmental activists, as noted in the 'The Environmental Activities Hand Book' authored by Gayatri Singh, Kerban Ankleswaria and Colins Gonsalves, that the Judges are carried away by the money spent on projects and that mega projects, that harm the environment are not condemned. However, this criticism seems to be baseless since in Virender Gaur & Others vs. State of Haryana and others, 1998 (1) CTC 143 : 1995 (2) SCC 577, this Court insisted on the demolition of structure which have been constructed on the lands reserved for common purposes and that this Court did not allow its decision in several cases issuing directions and ensuring its enforcement by nothing short of demolition or restoration of status quo ante. The fact that crores of rupees was spent already on development projects did not convince this Court while being in a zeal to jealously safeguarding the environment and in preventing the abuse of the environment by a group of humans or the authorities under the State for that matter."
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Ramaraju, S/O. N.A. Subbaraja vs The State Of Tamil Nadu, Rep. By Its ... on 26 April, 2005
In such circumstances, the reference made on behalf of the petitioners in the judgment passed by the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Ramaraju vs. The State of Tamil Nadu reported in 2005 (2) CTC 741 is of no use to the petitioners in this case, for the reason that it was a case wherein for removal of encroachment notice was issued by public address system and through beat of drums or by general notice in newspapers.
Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation vs Nawab Khan Gulab Khan & Ors on 11 October, 1996
The Supreme Court in its decision in Ahmedabad Muncipal Corporation vs. Nawab Khan Gulab Khan, AIR 1997 SC 152 has held that individual persons who are encroachers are entitled to reasonable notice.
L. Krishnan And Ors. vs State Of Tamil Nadu Represented By The ... on 24 April, 1991
In the case of L.Krishnan vs. State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary, Chennai 600 009 reported in 2005 (4) CTC 1, a Division Bench of this Court consisting of Justice Markendey Katju (as His Lordship then was) and Justice F.M.Ibrahim Kalifulla has held that Article 51-A(g) of the Constitution makes it a fundamental duty of every citizen to protect and improve natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers and wild life.