Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (1.03 seconds)THE COMMERCIAL COURTS ACT, 2015
Mars Incorporated vs Kumar Krishna Mukerjee And Ors. on 30 October, 2002
and 'MARS
Incorporated Vs. Kumar Krishna Mukherjee & Ors.' To establish
that the domain names of plaintiff registered, plaintiff also furnished
details of the plaintiff's domain name registrations. Plaintiff also
furnished the details of registration of domain names of defendant
nos.1 to 20 which are as under:
Satyam Infoway Ltd vs Siffynet Solutions Pvt. Ltd on 6 May, 2004
), Hon'ble High Court of Calcuttta, citing the
Satyam case held that a domain name is chosen as "an instrument of
commercial enterprise not only because it facilitates the ability of
consumers to navigate the Internet to find websites they are looking
for, but also at the same time, serves to identify and distinguish the
business itself, or its goods or services, and to specify its
corresponding Internet location."
Rajat Agarwal & Ors vs Spartan Online Pvt. Ltd. & Ors on 12 May, 2017
9. Similarly, in 'Rajat Agarwal Vs. Spartan Online'; AIR
2017 (NOC) 846 (CAL.
Karam Kapahi & Ors vs M/S Lal Chand Public Charitabl ... on 7 April, 2010
In 'Karam Kapahi and Others v. Lal Chand Public
Charitable Trust'; (2010) 4 SCC 753. The Hon'ble Apex Court
considered:-
Charanjit Lal Mehra & Ors vs Smt.Kamal Saroj Mahajan&Anr on 11 March, 2005
41. Keeping the width of this provision in mind this
Court held that under this rule admissions can be
inferred from facts and circumstances of the case [See
Charanjit Lal Mehra and Ors. v. Kamal Saroj Mahajan
(Smt.) and Anr. (2005) 11 SCC 279 at page 285 (para
Shikharchand And Ors. vs Mst. Bari Bai And Ors. on 12 September, 1973
45. Order 12 Rule 6 of the Code has been very lucidly
discussed and succinctly interpreted in a Division
Bench judgment of Madhya Pradesh High Court in
the case of Shikharchand and Ors. v. Mst. Bari Bai
Digitally
PREETI signed by
CS (Comm.)
Celador Productions Ltd. vs Gaurav Mehrotra And Anr. on 18 January, 2002
In the case of 'Celador Productions Ltd. Vs.
Gaurav Mehrotra' ; 96 (2002) DLT 543, the defendant used a name on
its website i.e. crorepatikaun.com or kaun banega crorepati as a
second level domain, which was similar to that of the plaintiff's game
Digitally
CS (Comm.)
Times Internet Ltd vs Jonathan S. And Another on 17 April, 2012
11. Further, in 'Times Internet Ltd. Vs. Jonathan S. & Anr.'
decided on 17.4.2012 in CS (OS) 1742 of 2007, Hon'ble Delhi High
Court held that the defendant has been using a deceptively similar
trademark of the plaintiff i.e. Indiatimes, which would take the
consumer, who was searching for the plaintiff's domain, to another
domain site. It was held that the domain name can not be similar to
that of the plaintiff, as it would deceive the consumer who is looking
for the particular domain.
1