Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 73 (0.54 seconds)Section 31 in The Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 [Entire Act]
Section 30 in The Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 [Entire Act]
Article 32 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 227 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 136 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
The Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007
Section 14 in The Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 [Entire Act]
Section 15 in The Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 [Entire Act]
Titaghur Paper Mills Co. Ltd vs State Of Orissa on 13 April, 1983
15. Thus, while it can be said that this Court has recognised some
exceptions to the rule of alternative remedy i.e. where the statutory
authority has not acted in accordance with the provisions of the enactment
in question, or in defiance of the fundamental principles of judicial
procedure, or has resorted to invoke the provisions which are repealed, or
when an order has been passed in total violation of the principles of
natural justice, the proposition laid down in Thansingh Nathmal case,
Titaghur Paper Mills case and other similar judgments that the High Court
will not entertain a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution if an
effective alternative remedy is available to the aggrieved person or the
statute under which the action complained of has been taken itself contains
a mechanism for redressal of grievance still holds the field. Therefore,
when a statutory forum is created by law for redressal of grievances, a
writ petition should not be entertained ignoring the statutory
dispensation."