Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.21 seconds)
National Insurance Co Ltd vs Raj Dulari And Ors on 19 April, 2023 cites

Ningamma & Anr vs United India Insurance Co.Ltd on 13 May, 2009

9. In view of the position noted above, the appeal is allowed. Award dated 02.07.2015, is modified and respondent/claimant Nos.1 to 3 are held entitled to Rs.1,00,000/- in terms of the clause referred to above as contained in the insurance company which restricts liability to a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- under personal accident coverage. Aforesaid amount be paid to the respondent claimants by the appellant along with interest @ 9% per annum within four weeks from today.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 814 - M Sharma - Full Document

Ramkhiladi vs The United India Insurance Company on 7 January, 2020

5. A perusal of the aforementioned extract would reveal that as per the policy applicable, the personal accident coverage of the owner and driver was indemnified and on a reading of the policy, it was found that there was no cap on the amount of compensation payable by the insurance company in the policy nor was there any condition in the policy that tariff fixed by the Indian Motor Tariff would be applicable in respect of personal accident claim. The judgment relied upon also makes a mention to the decision of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Ramkhiladi vs. United India Insurance Company 2020 (2) SCC 550, as per which, in terms of policy personal accident was limited to an amount of Rs.1 Lakh.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 239 - M R Shah - Full Document

New India Assurance Co. Ltd vs Manjit Kaur And Ors on 5 January, 2004

8. Faced with the aforementioned decision, learned counsel for respondent/claimant Nos.1 to 3 relies upon the decision of a Coordinate Bench of this Court in the case of New India Assurance Company Limited versus Manjit Kaur and others', FAO No.4994 of 2014, decided on 16.07.2015, to contend that in a comprehensive policy where additional payment was made for a driver and where the personal accident of the owner was covered under the policy, the borrower from the owner would also be covered and would therefore be entitled to compensation to the extent the insurance company is liable under the policy. Relevant extract of the decision in Manjit Kaur and others'case (supra) is reproduced as under:-
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 12 - V N Khare - Full Document

Vasuki vs Santhi on 7 October, 2021

2 of 6 ::: Downloaded on - 22-04-2023 01:03:34 ::: Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC:054789 FAO-6746-2015(O&M) [3] 2023:PHHC:054789 Nos.1 to 3 refers to the decision of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Vasuki and another vs. Santhi and another 2021 (4) TAC 224, to contend that the respondents/claimants are entitled to the compensation as awarded by the learned Tribunal. Relevant extract of the aforementioned decision is reproduced as under:-
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 1 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1