Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 15 (0.37 seconds)
M/S Narang Medicine Company vs Swaran Lata Agarwal & Anr. on 13 February, 2017 cites

Raja Mohammad Amir Ahmad Khan vs Municipal Board Of Sitapur And Anr. on 3 December, 1964

13. The law as to tenancy being determined by forfeiture by denial of the lessor's title or disclaimer of the tenancy has been adopted in India from the Law of England where it originated as a principle in consonance with justice, equity and good conscience. On enactment of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, the same was incorporated into clause (g) of Section 111. So just is the rule that it has been held applicable even in the areas where the Transfer of Property Act does not apply (See : Raja Mohammad Amir Ahmad Khan Vs. Municipal Board of Sitapur and Anr. AIR 1965 SC 1923). The principle of determination of tenancy by forfeiture consequent upon denial of the lessor's title may not be applicable where rent control legislation intervenes and such legislation while extending protection to tenants from eviction does not recognize such denial or disclaimer as a ground for termination of tenancy and eviction of tenant. However, in various rent control legislations such a ground is recognized and incorporated as a ground for eviction of tenant either expressly or impliedly by bringing it within the net of an act injurious to the interest of the landlord on account of its mischievous content to prejudice adversely and substantially the interest of the landlord."
Supreme Court of India Cites 7 - Cited by 82 - N R Ayyangar - Full Document
1   2 Next